Archive for June, 2006

I like them, I really do

Friday, June 30th, 2006

This 3 novella anthology has been a very interesting experience. I’m really trying not to say much about Wild Wild West for a couple of reasons. A., no telling how much will change by the time all edits are done and B. it’s so far ahead of release that it’s not really a good time to post excerpts and so on.

But I really like the people in this book. Each couple sets the tone for their novella and they all have a different mood. Romantic, playful, and the deeper emotions. I’m having a lot of fun with them and I like the way they surprise me. I like the overall arc of the thing, how each mood flows into the next. Wish July 07 wasn’t so far away!

Head. Hurts.

Thursday, June 29th, 2006

There are too many people in my head right now and the only effective form of excorcism is to Finish The Book. I’ll be delivering a bunch of projects in a row, thank God, so that should ease the pressure up there.

Had an awful moment yesterday when I remembered a line I’d written recently and COULD NOT REMEMBER which bloody book it was in. (Miss Lonely Hearts, it turns out) Head is too full when I can’t keep things straight. Of course, this is why I have files of notes and scenes and potential scenes alongside the story, synopsis and blurb. Because I don’t trust my brain to hold it all.

If I start sounding a little incoherent as I approach the finish point (and then again and again), you’ll all know why. All these people need to go live someplace else!

Why shorts?

Wednesday, June 28th, 2006

So I thought I’d do a blog entry on why I like to write short stories, even though there is virtually no market for them. First of all, there is something really satisfying about a project you can complete in a single sitting. Novel writing is like running a marathon, it’s all about endurance. Even a novella is not going to get finished in a single session. But a short-short, I can sit down and write one and be finished! There’s a lot of satisfaction in that.

Also, it’s good for my creative self. It allows me to experiment, stretch, try different things or simply explore ideas that aren’t big enough to sustain a longer work. It’s a very refreshing change of pace for me, like writing a poem. It flexes my creative muscles in a different direction and lets me come back to novels and novellas refreshed. It does something to sort of “reset” my brain in between longer works, too.

And I like the idea of being able to provide short reads on a semi-regular basis to offer something of value to readers, and I’m a person who likes to write stories about what happens to characters before or after the “main” story. Before I started in on the book that’s currently being shopping around, I wrote a short story about the main characters. The novel then developed in a totally different direction from what I’d initially imagined, but it let me put them together and see how they interacted and that helped me flesh out the novel. I went into it with a new depth because I went back in time to before the novel started with them, without cluttering up my book with backstory.

Finally, the exercise of writing a short story affirms something very important: my process works. It may not be like anybody else’s process, but it’s my process and I can trust it. It works, every time.

Off to write some more pages! The plot is thickening and the characters are starting to feel the burn as I hold their feet to the fire, heh heh.

Romantic Times reviews are in!

Tuesday, June 27th, 2006

And I’m so, so relieved. Thank you ED for the sneak peek! The Gripping Beast garnered a stupendous 4 and 1/2 Stars! WOW! Here’s a quick quote from reviewer Faith Smith. (Wish I could post the whole thing because it rocks, but it’ll be on the RT site soon enough.)

“…this book is more than an erotic bedtime story — it’s an entrancing tale of romantic love, with sensual scenes and characters that will live in readers’ minds for a long time.”

Catalyst also received a very positive review and 3 Stars from RT reviewer Cindy Himler.

“This is a fun, pleasant read. Veronica is a well-written character with insecurities that will be familiar to many…And the entry of Sebastian, the pet from hell, as a protagonist, is a lot of fun.”

She said fun twice, I take that as a good sign! mrgreen

News from around the web!

Monday, June 26th, 2006

Cheyenne McCray’s Seduced by Magic is a Rhapsody and Doubleday bookclub selection! Hop over to congratulate her if you haven’t already. Also this is Monday and she posts those cowboy pictures on Mondays…

Diana P. has unveiled the Secret Society website! Very cool.

Doug at Balls and Walnuts needs guest bloggers. Because otherwise the internet would suffer a dire lack of posts on sex and food when he goes on vacation.

So there’s some news. Me? I’m trying to stay cool while this big, bright yellow thing hangs in the sky (apparently all the rain has been sent elsewhere) and get page count.

What she said part 2, the parody

Sunday, June 25th, 2006

because I couldn’t help myself.

Scene opens on a typical city bar at night. There’s a crowd of 30-something urban professionals. Zoom on blonde woman seated on barstool. A man approaches.

Man: “Hey, baby. Let’s have sex.”
Woman: “My name isn’t baby, and what happened to buying me a drink first?”
Man: “Didn’t you get the new notes? We don’t banter. We don’t get to know each other. We just do it.”
Woman: “There was a last-minute change? Dammit. Okay, well, we can wing it. Skip the banter, check. What’s my motivation in this scene?”
Man: “That was one of the changes. We don’t need motivation. Apparently breathing is enough.”
Woman: “Ewwww. Have you seen some of the guys around here who are breathing? I’m not supposed to do ALL of them, am I?”
Man: “I get you, but we’re wasting paper here. We have to have sex in chapter one, so how about getting naked?”
Woman: “Are you sure you’re breathing? When did a vampire get written in?”
Man: “Okay, fine, you outted me, I don’t breathe anymore. But other than that, I’m a regular guy. Feel free to get naked now. Or I could help.”
Woman: “Maybe you should just go hang out with Jake and I’ll take care of the sex scene by myself.”

*just to clarify, I’m very grateful that St. Martin’s, Samhain and Ellora’s Cave are all about quality stories! And I’m really hoping that the message AK is talking about is misunderstood, because I really can’t imagine the above parody is what any editor wants.*

Um, what she said and pestering PBW

Sunday, June 25th, 2006

I think we should all pester PBW to write the book about John the half-demon cop. Really. Because that’s what she gets for writing such an interesting example in her plotting how-to.

Angela Knight has a column on erotic romance that says it all. It’s very disconcerting to hear that an editor might think things like plot and characterization aren’t needed in a novel. I can’t even imagine trying to fill an entire book with nothing but disconnected sex scenes. I’d be bored by page 50 and by page 100 they’d all start dying in horrible, mysterious ways or beds would spontaneously blow up just to have some action.

Good grief, my short story is an erotic romance, and it contains plot, setting, characterization, conflict, resolution, romance, happily ever after. And hot sex. If it was nothing but hot sex, there’d be no STORY. I’m not saying it would win any awards, but it does contain all the elements of fiction. Readers read books for stories, that seems pretty clear. So, to sum up, if there’s no story I can’t imagine who would want to write it let alone read it.

Now I’m hearing that line from Natalie Goldberg about her first novel attempt; “It has no narrative drive”.